English 109H: Reflection on Project 3 Draft

This post will serve as a reflection on the peer review of my draft, as well as the direction of my draft overall.

Hyperlinks to peer review sheets:
Charles
Scott

I feel that the feedback I got for my project was helpful overall. Addie and Charles were great in telling me what sounded awkward and what needed to be added, but also showed me what was good within my draft so I could continue that.
The instructor conferences were very helpful as well, as it mostly helped me to realize what I need to change in my argument itself.

What aspects of Project 3 need to most work going forward [Audience, Purpose, Argumentation, or Genre]? How do you plan on addressing these areas?

For my specific draft, I think that I need to work on my purpose and argumentation the most. For my purpose, I really want to be sure to write about AI in a positive light, even enough so that the audience may start to see it in a good light as well. I think that this would help to get the younger generation interested in working with AI as well. As for the argumentation, after instructor conferencing I now realize that I need to add some more of my own commentary on each source that I present within my listicle. So, I will go through and add my own thoughts.

How are you feeling overall about the direction of your project after peer review and/or instructor conferences this week?

I'm actually feeling pretty good with my project so far! The instructor conference was all about helping me with the bulk of my project, but I do not need to change too much. Addie and Charles' feedback helped me with the details of my project, which is especially helpful because as writers, we sometimes neglect the details. With this feedback, I think that I can make my final project a strong one!

English 109H